| |  | | | 
EVALUATION OF WEBSITES
Content
- Is the audience clear?
- Is the content well-organized?
- Is the information unbiased and neutral?
- Is controversial data cited?
- Are conclusions consistent with the facts?
- Are any links provided reputable?
- Has the information been peer reviewed?
|
Author(s)
- Are (is) the author(s) identified?
- Do the authors have appropriate credential or educational background for the content?
- Are conflicts of interest stated?
- Is the purpose of the site educational and defined?
|
References/Documentation
- Are references for each section cited?
- Are references complete?
- Are references from reputable sources?
- Are references from human work?
|
Design/Site organization
- Is the site easy to navigate and find information?
- Does the site have a map, index, search or help screen (s)
- Are there any disclaimers regarding the information?
- Does the site note that it is not intended to provide medical advice or replace a professional?
|
Date of publication
- Is the information current?
- Is the information updated and when was it last updated?
|
These criteria are adapted from Drug Information Resource and literature retrieval by Marie Abate, PSAP Book 5, 4th edition 2002
|
| | |
